This is really great stuff. Outside the NY Times is this billboard on the right. It speaks not of the two towers struck by airplanes on 9/11, but the obvious, and unanswered question, “What made the third tower fall that day?”
Gee, it EXACTLY resembled every controlled demolition in every movie of them ever shown. But the official story says it fell in sympathy with its neighboring buildings – or something like that. What does the NY Times say about that building, and in response to this billboard outside their entrance?
“We have not found any evidence so far – that doesn’t mean there’s none there – but we’ve not found any evidence so far to suggest that the building collapses were caused by anything other than the two airplanes that flew into them.”
To you idiots out there, these geniuses are clearly explaining about the magical airplanes that killed three buildings with two planes, kinda like “killing two birds with one stone” on steroids.
They had a similar story about a single magic bullet that entered JFK with multiple entry wounds and multiple exit wounds – clearly explained by ricochets off his bones and such.. untrained people wouldn’t understand… just trust us.
Among the guys who have a real hard time believing the official 9/11 are the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. All the evidence they have, all the training they have, all the experience they have – these folks who designed, engineered and built every major building in recent history – seems to contradict the official story of 9/11/2001.
All they ask is an honest investigation. It is unrealistic to expect co-conspirators to do so. However, You can. It matters.
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/silver/t24_ag_en_usoz_2.gif)
