The USofA federal government, the United Nations and all other subordinate agencies of The Bilderberg Group have been pushing the pseudo-science of man-made global warming as a Trojan-horse for their agenda.
Actual scientific-method science, with real scientists working in the fields of their expertise, find massive evidence of normal earth weather patterns.
Apparently I’m not alone in my disgust for the tale, those marketing it, and the massive following of that mythology.
The Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP), Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, and The Heartland Institute combined resources to impanel legitimate climate scientist to study the evidence without political pressure and deliver analysis devoid of population control, power consolidating agendas.
Their full publication set here can be yours by clicking the link: Read Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science for free online by using the following links:
Also at that page is a link to a 24-page MSWord document (linux-friendly) titled:
Summary For Policymakers
Which happens to work very well for people like me who don’t need the full scientifically-supported document.
The summary from their web page is below:
“…CCR II: Physical Science is an independent, comprehensive, and authoritative report on the current state of climate science.
It is the fourth in a series of scholarly reports produced by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), an international network of climate scientists sponsored by three nonprofit organizations: the Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP), Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, and The Heartland Institute.
Whereas the reports of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warn of a dangerous human effect on climate, NIPCC concludes the human effect is likely to be small relative to natural variability, and whatever small warming is likely to occur will produce benefits as well as costs…”
Another review of their report, page and publication is here from Fox News:
An excerpt from that web page:
A peer-reviewed climate change study released Wednesday by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change finds the threat of man-made global warming to be not only greatly exaggerated but so small as to be “embedded within the background variability of the natural climate system” and not dangerous.
Armed with the new findings, Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee grilled administration environmental policy officials about the economic consequences of its aggressive regulatory crackdown on the fossil fuel industry.
The 1,000 page study was the work of 47 scientists and scholars examining many of the same journals and studies that the United Nations International Panel on Climate Change (UNIPCC) examined, producing entirely different conclusions.
“This volume provides the scientific balance that is missing from the overly alarmist reports from the IPCC, which are highly selective in their review of climate science,” the authors write.
The study was done under the auspices of the Heartland Institute, which claims it “has no formal attachment to or sponsorship from any government or governmental agency.”
The Heartland Institute’s president, Joseph Bast, said of the study, “The big issue in the global warming debate is how large is the human impact on climate. And this report shows that it is very small, that natural variability, the variability that’s caused by natural cycles of the sun and other factors, way outweigh anything the human impact could have.”
The report comes in advance of the expected release later this month of a new U.N. report on climate change. Leaked drafts of that report show surface temperature increases have been statistically insignificant for the last 15 years, and that Antarctic sea ice is increasing, not decreasing.
In addition, new satellite measurements of Arctic sea ice show it has increased this year.”